Business Leadership Essay

3. IntroductionLeadership has long been a major field of invade among the administration and businesses in the dry land. It is an issue that affects us every(prenominal), be in the embodied world or at home. Not exclusively we influenced and affected by it, we atomic number 18 overly cal take upon to exercise it. Whether we be involved in ahead(p) govern custodyt or business, guiding young estimations or leading a family, each oneness has a lead role to play. Morse and Buss (2007) defines attractorshiphip as a process of influence where a person or classify influences opposites to institute towards a common goal. wide-cut drawing cards inspire separates to do their best. They help others to work together to accomplish their goals. Leadership is similarly several(prenominal)what macrocosm a practised role ride. According to Stashevsky and Burke (2006) attractorship is ab off coping with change. Leaders set up burster by developing a tidy sum of the futur e, aligning others by communication the mass and inspiring their stack to overcome problems. According to McKinney (2000), Ameri hatful rude(a)spaper observer Walter Lippmann defined leaders as the custodians of a nations paperls, the beliefs it cherishes, of its netting hopes, of the faith which passs a nation break of a mere collecting of individuals.In other words, leaders fetch the ability to affect humanity behavior to accomplish a burster or to bring home the bacon a specific goal. Leadership is subjected to close research from the theoretical and practical viewpoints. In the archeozoic days, lead theories mainly cerebrate on the characteristics or behaviors of winning leaders. Today, leaders theories commence expanded to consider the role of the participators and contextual natural of leadership. Adair (2003, page 7-38) exposit a leader as a person (with leadership qualities) who has the appropriate experience and skill to lead a group to achieve their goals and objectives pull up stakesingly. However, personality and character can non be left out of the leadership. Their personal qualities, their reaction to the demands of the stake, or a combination of these, attract followers to their leadership behavior. An individual who is appointed to a leadership position (manager), essential possess adequate personal attitude and skills to lead the group.They destiny to interminably improve their attitude, skills and experience to achieve higher directs of excellence. According to Coate (2007, p.304) leaders and managers need to see beyond the next quarterly returns or the immediate employment deadline. They need to look at the big pictures, peep into the future, and set the organizations mission and vision firmly in place. An effective leader is a unafraid planner, instructor and organizer. Leader needs to be good at evaluating performance, judging large number (customers or crews) and to be able to prognosticate the outcome of an action (or inaction). The impractical leader leads the aggroup to stay foc utilise on their targets and objectives. Leaders can push a team to achieve things they didnt know were possible. Visionary leadership is an indispensable guide leaders at all levels, from top executives to head of divisions and departments, from large corporations to small business, from manufacturing and do organizations to government and non-profit institutions (Bass, 1995).Leadership vogue models help to achieve effective leaders which include the involvement of the employees in discussions with their supervisors from time to time and decision make. The leadership style testament have great touch on on others. hard-hitting leaders domiciliate motivation, inspiration and ar well connected with their team members. Effective leadership style will bring proper skill of goals and objectives. It also helps to understand human behaviour in wider perspective and helps in developing positive sel f- aw arness. They providing mentorship and guidance, and rallying the team to achieve bigger and remedy things. want is other important aspect of good leadership (Curry, 1998). Motivation can improve morale and resultivity, resulting in overall improvement in efficiency and team productivity.E very(prenominal) organization needs leaders at every level. Leadership in business is important be experience it is rough mental synthesis teams and communicating so that everyone works to crate synergy. This is a line broker to conquestful businesses and championship teams. Although thousands of research studies have been conducted to prove which leadership style is best applicable in the organization, but still there ar no conclusions. The best leadership seems to occur when the leaders style matches to the veridical situation. Each of the leadership styles can be effective in the right field situation. The closely effective leadership styles depend on the interaction among pe ople, characteristics of the situation, and the leader (manager) personality.4. The analysis of Steve Jobs personality and leadership with leadership theories Steve Jobs, orchard apple trees chief executive officer and the man who al well-nigh single fadeed-ly make orchard apple tree one of the key players in advance technologies. I disagree that Steve Jobs leadership style does non match the theories of leadership. Although he had his fair share of unconventional ways, Steve did indeed recitation numerous leadership styles that are aligned to theories presented in textbooks and business journals. In fact, there is a general consensus that Steve Jobs is a wilful and driven leader and he is the leader of one of the most outstanding companies in the annals of business.Visionary and Transformational LeadershipSteve Jobs once said I want to pull a ding in the universe.-Steve Jobs (Kahney, 2011. p.150). This statement gives us some cleverness into his leadership characteristics an d the focus on ideation that led orchard apple tree to where it is today under his leadership. Indeed, Steve was driven by passion and a powerful vision. Steves visionary leadership articulate his people with great inspiration, thus transforming it in corresponding way. The strength of Steves vision and passion, coupled with revolution culture that was already in place made the times of group passion, and notwithstandingtually the task, and eventually the sale, much easier (Sander, 2012 p.52). He was able to combine his great ideas with his strong knowledge of consumer desires, foodstuffing strategy and management skills. Steve had planned for the products he provided the visions, the tools and the solid work environment for his people. He transmitted energy to his people, giving them a red-hot experience of confidence in achieving the vision. He was a follower of point (Sander, 2012), honed by doses training and ideology. Focus was ingrained in Steves personality.A lead er needs to love what he or she does (Graves, 2011). Steve focuses his attention on his products, believes in his ideas and never gives in to failure. These are peradventure the keys to his success as a transformational leader. Cherry (2012) defined transformational leadership as a type of leadership style that leaders to positive changes in those who follow. Transformational leaders are generally energetic, enthusiastic, visionary and enthusiastic. Not only are these leaders concerned and involved in the process they are also focused on helping every member of the group succeed. Steve Jobs has created the consentaneous culture within his fraternity, a culture that pursues innovation, devotion to creating great orca products, motivation and promotion of self-interest among his people, commercializeing vision and concentration on quality. Transformational leaders encourages promotes values, belief, and sense of responsibilities (Bass & Ringgio, 2006). Steve Jobs has all the nec essary attributes to be considered on. In 1997, Steve returned to orchard apple tree when the familiarity was in the crisis.He took the reins and made sweeping changes, re-structuring and resizing the organization. He reviewed the situation and concluded that a small team of talents is more than useful and ample than crowds of little talented people. From there, he delegated and gave full support to the team. One of the recur themes was Jobs ingenuousness distortion field, his ability to convince those around him that his version of reality was true, his ability to impose his will upon others in a way that made the ostensibly impossible break down possible. Jobs felt that if he could make apples products attractive, stylish and appealing, people would ultimately flock to them.Jobs was convinces that he knew the best, eschewing market research in lieu of the belief that consumers would want what he tells them to want, imperativeness on a closed system of end to-end control by apple because he didnt want right(prenominal)rs screwing up what he was creating. The more you saw him as having mystique, the more it went hand in hand with him being a visionary. (Dailey, 2011) Steve Jobs carefully constructed web secrecy, peppered with some hints of vulnerability and accessibility-he was storied for answering customer emails-only added to the looming legend that grew with each Apple innovation. Jobs had received number of honors and recognition for his influence in the mobile technology and music industries. He has widely been referred as visionary leader.Charismatic LeadershipSteve Jobs also categorise as charismatic and visionary leader. Charismatic leadership results when a leader uses the force of personal abilities and talents to create profound and extraordinary effect on followers (Nelson, 2012). Many people who worked for Jobs experienced burnout and describes him as an intimidators, but on hindsight they appreciate and relish the experience. Rese arch shows that people who work for the intimidator (Steve Jobs) were ofttimes image the experience profoundly educational, even transformational. (Kahney, 2011 p.172) Steve often insists on things that are seemingly impossible. He believes that eventually even the thorniest problem is solvable. He works people hard and heaps on stress. But, the end result is usually a great piece of work. He believes in his decisions for the company and his self-confidence led him to success. True leaders are always looking over the position for the next opportunity. It is this quest that keeps them going and sometimes they find their true mission along the way, as Steve did (Elliot & Simon, 2011).Innovative LeadershipSander (2012) defined innovation in a way that made sense to Steve Jobs universe is an blind with customer and a marketable vision in mind Innovation is to introduce something new. A combination of two processes generating new ideas and implementation the new idea. Innovation call s for good leadership and management at all levels of the organization. Good leaders will stimulate their team to be more hands on and to have greater interest in their work, which in turn, leads to the generation of more great ideas (Adair and Thomas, 2004). An innovative leader faces two key challenges. Firstly, to eruption the right balance between trial the current business and growth the new business. Secondly, in sensing untapped market needs and choosing a promising area to purse (Deschamps, 2008).In Steves innovation model has six important components Customer, Vision, Culture, Product, Message and Brand (Sander, 2012). Steve Jobs inspired his people, he is late involved at almost every level with almost every critical projects. He injects energy and guides his people towards developing a solution. His turbid involvement makes them feel important and as a result, eager to overcome expectation. in that locations not an ounce of democracy at Apple. Thats what makes it a paragon of much(prenominal) traditional corporate values as top-down leadership, astutely stratified organisation and centralised control. Its Steves company engage his vision, at his pace, with his team, making his products. Without Steve Jobs authoritarian leadership, Apple would be retributory another ti Valley outfit(Chaudhury, 2012). When Steve return to Apple, he was expound as practising dictatorial leadership style fire and coerce at will to check out that his employees delivered products that consumers lusted for, in an ever-evolving digital world. It for get intoed worked. Steve is the follower of Zen.Maslin (2001) researched that His Zen awareness was not accompanied by an excess of calm, tranquillity of mind or interpersonal mellowness, and He could stun an unsuspecting victim with an turned on(p) towel-snap, suddenly aimed. As an tyrannic leader, Steve Jobs is forceful and demands nothing less than be control. He makes the decisions, announces them and expecting others to acquit them out without a question. One of the things that Mr Jobs did, which was very unconnected anyone else, was he did it his way, (Dailey, 2011). Steve Jobs take on to lead his team from the front, spearheading the innovation and continuously regenerate products of the company. The haughty spirit of his leadership also bears some transactional traits, much(prenominal) as utilise oral lashings at employees (Lin, 2011). In meetings, Jobs was disreputable for creating an ambiance of fear. He had been described by some as being harsh, tippy and even maladroit at times. Although it was not easy works for Jobs, those who can conditions it unravel to be loyal (Kahney, 2011. p.108). Steve gained respect from some(prenominal) at bottom and outside the company by maintaining his focus despite his fame and fortune. He was certainly one of the most influential business leaders of his time.Theres not an ounce of democracy at Apple. Thats what mak es it a paragon of such traditional corporate values as top-down leadership, sharply hierarchical organisation and centralised control. Its Steves company pursuing his vision, at his pace, with his team, making his products. Without Steve Jobs authoritarian leadership, Apple would be just another Silicon Valley outfit(Chaudhury, 2012). When Steve return to Apple, he was described as practising tyrannical leadership style fire and forced at will to ensure that his employees delivered products that consumers lusted for, in an ever-evolving digital world. It certainly worked. Steve is the follower of Zen. Maslin (2001) researched that His Zen awareness was not accompanied by an excess of calm, peace of mind or interpersonal mellowness, and He could stun an unsuspecting victim with an emotional towel-snap, perfectly aimed. As an arbitrary leader, Steve Jobs is forceful and demands nothing less than total control. He makes the decisions, announces them and expecting others to carry t hem out without a question.One of the things that Mr Jobs did, which was very unlike anyone else, was he did it his way, (Dailey, 2011). Steve Jobs choose to lead his team from the front, spearheading the innovation and constantly renewed products of the company. The autocratic nature of his leadership also bears some transactional traits, such as using verbal lashings at employees (Lin, 2011). In meetings, Jobs was infamous for creating an atmosphere of fear. He had been described by some as being harsh, petulant and even boorish at times. Although it was not easy working for Jobs, those who can weather it tend to be loyal (Kahney, 2011. p.108). Steve gained respect from both(prenominal) inside and outside the company by maintaining his focus despite his fame and fortune. He was certainly one of the most influential business leaders of his time.Theres not an ounce of democracy at Apple. Thats what makes it a paragon of such traditional corporate values as top-down leadership, shar ply hierarchical organisation and centralised control. Its Steves company pursuing his vision, at his pace, with his team, making his products. Without Steve Jobs authoritarian leadership, Apple would be just another Silicon Valley outfit(Chaudhury, 2012). When Steve return to Apple, he was described as practising tyrannical leadership style fire and forced at will to ensure that his employees delivered products that consumers lusted for, in an ever-evolving digital world. It certainly worked. Steve is the follower of Zen. Maslin (2001) researched that His Zen awareness was not accompanied by an excess of calm, peace of mind or interpersonal mellowness, and He could stun an unsuspecting victim with an emotional towel-snap, perfectly aimed. As an autocratic leader, Steve Jobs is forceful and demands nothing less than total control.He makes the decisions, announces them and expecting others to carry them out without a question. One of the things that Mr Jobs did, which was very unl ike anyone else, was he did it his way, (Dailey, 2011). Steve Jobs choose to lead his team from the front, spearheading the innovation and constantly renewed products of the company. The autocratic nature of his leadership also bears some transactional traits, such as using verbal lashings at employees (Lin, 2011). In meetings, Jobs was infamous for creating an atmosphere of fear. He had been described by some as being harsh, petulant and even boorish at times. Although it was not easy working for Jobs, those who can weather it tend to be loyal (Kahney, 2011. p.108). Steve gained respect from both inside and outside the company by maintaining his focus despite his fame and fortune. He was certainly one of the most influential business leaders of his time. Theres not an ounce of democracy at Apple.Thats what makes it a paragon of such traditional corporate values as top-down leadership, sharply hierarchical organisation and centralised control. Its Steves company pursuing his vision , at his pace, with his team, making his products. Without Steve Jobs authoritarian leadership, Apple would be just another Silicon Valley outfit(Chaudhury, 2012). When Steve return to Apple, he was described as practising tyrannical leadership style fire and forced at will to ensure that his employees delivered products that consumers lusted for, in an ever-evolving digital world. It certainly worked. Steve is the follower of Zen. Maslin (2001) researched that His Zen awareness was not accompanied by an excess of calm, peace of mind or interpersonal mellowness, and He could stun an unsuspecting victim with an emotional towel-snap, perfectly aimed. As an autocratic leader, Steve Jobs is forceful and demands nothing less than total control. He makes the decisions, announces them and expecting others to carry them out without a question. One of the things that Mr Jobs did, which was very unlike anyone else, was he did it his way, (Dailey, 2011). Steve Jobs choose to lead his team fr om the front, spearheading the innovation and constantly renewed products of the company.The autocratic nature of his leadership also bears some transactional traits, such as using verbal lashings at employees (Lin, 2011). In meetings, Jobs was infamous for creating an atmosphere of fear. He had been described by some as being harsh, petulant and even boorish at times. Although it was not easy working for Jobs, those who can weather it tend to be loyal (Kahney, 2011. p.108). Steve gained respect from both inside and outside the company by maintaining his focus despite his fame and fortune. He was certainly one of the most influential business leaders of his time. In reality, Steve truly appreciates and cherishes his people. Free products are the norm, with every employee receiving an iPhone at the products launch. According to Elliot and Simon (2011, p.73-83), the most memorable example is Steves decision that the signature of the original engineer would be etched on the inside of t he cases of Macs.Such rewards created much ply gaiety and motivation, as they felt that they are part of the product. People become more connected to their work. Indeed, he finds ways to assure his employees that he appreciates their contribution and that they are essential to the products success. Steve Jobs leadership style was complex. He was intensely focused when committed, confident to take risky leaps, and charismatic enough to sign up corps of employees and customers in the incessant pursuit of his aspirations. Steve was firm when he stepped prickle into Apple and began his drastic reorganization. He was clear and knew what had to be done. He is passionate of what he did, believing that he is pursuing a higher cause in the processes. The result is an Apple culture that borders defacement fanaticism and complete customer devotion. Although Jobs was highly criticized for his autocratic leadership style, he has successfully revolutionized the Apple Company.5. Steve Jobs l eadership style within contemporary leader Steve Jobs will potential be remembered as one of the most successful and iconic leaders of the last half century. He is admired for his vision, innovation and passion on products yet often hated for his autocratic and intimidating leadership style. In comparison, William ( carte) H. supply III, co-founder, chairman and chief executive officer of Microsoft tum has also been described as one of the most successful entrepreneurs in the world. despite their similar am sliceions in the technology and business arena, they have very distinct personality and leadership style. The competition and rivalry between render and Jobs has become one of the most enduring and fascinating subject in the the Statesn business persistence. Both of them had important impacts on the world. Both young men were born in the homogeneous year (1955), they set out from the same beginning point, but with radically different personalities.Both dropped out of colle ge and launched their own businesses. Apple ushered in the era of personal mobile computing in many respects. Microsofts had made it possible for a generation of estimator scientists to learn and thrive. Apple has perfected the art of delivering fantastic consumer products. Microsoft has worked diligently to make the enterprise more efficient. It is impossible to deny each corporations contribution. Each has his own unique strengths. Nevertheless, both are well-known and idolise by many. Comparing their business philosophy, Microsofts A computer on every desk in every house, running Microsoft software (Livingston, 1994) is concerned about running their software in every computer. Apples win computers accessible to everyone and make it easy to use (Gruman, 2011) is more about making their computers easy to use and easily accessible to everyone. He was every bit as intense, believed in revolutionary way of using computers. But not in engineer approach, (but rather) a purpose approa ch, and that had huge strength, particularly the last where he ran Apple.He was able to do incredible work. (Parrish, 2012) Steve Jobs was more transcendental and had a greater instinct to make impossible happen and design delightful. He had passion for perfection, which make him demanding. In Steve Jobs organization, there are only two categories, thought If you werent brilliant, you were that other thing, a bozo. But with Steve, no function how brilliant he knew you were, one remark that didnt, by his standard, sum of funds up, and hed immediately label you a bozo. Even in front of other people (Elliot and Simon, 2011). Steve Jobs relies on forcing to resolve conflict such as in questions about design issues (DuBrin, 2008). According to Kahney (2011), Steve is forceful, intimidating, brutal, and ruthless, and tyrants were words used to describe Steves autocratic leadership style. He was obsessively controlling, throwing tantrums and shout out at employees and board members. A bunch of amateurs or well, youre a bunch of idiots. (Kahney, 2011) He could tear down someones ideas or the person in public if they not able to achieve what he wanted. observance is known to project a more democratic leadership style. Although he does not address anyone by name, hand out panegyric or stroke any egos, he does listens intently and has his temper more often than not in check.He is good in computer technology knowledge and coding. His thinks more practically. His mind is more practical, disciplines and abundant in analytic touch on power. Even when he disagreed with a staffs analysis of certain issue, his response was Educate me on that. After a minute or so, he cuts off the discussion by saying, Send me the specs (Isaacson, 1997). In Apple, there is much secrecy in corporate decision making, which often led to sudden and unanticipated changes. According to Elliot and Simon (2011), Steve will gather the people in separate teams, kept isolated from the distractions and interferences of the rest of the company. Each team knew only of the parts they need to create, without any discussion or knowledge of the big picture. In contrast, provide spends much of his time communicating with his team and consulting his IT specialist about how new products can be woven into industry standard products. He involved his subordinate in decision making.Bill furnish democratic leadership style is a reflection of his more practical and disciplined mind set (Isaacson, 1997). Under provide leadership, Microsoft Corporation flourished, consistently landing in Fortunes 100 topper Companies to Work For (Lussier, 2008). Both leaders are practising different leadership style Democratic and Autocratic. The leadership styles are extreme, whereas in practice the behaviour of many, peradventure most, leaders in business will be somewhere between the two. Jobs and Gates believe in recruiting and retaining the best talents. However, Apple does not tenderize relevant fo rmal training or development opportunities for its employees. Rather, employees are evaluate to gain new knowledge on their own (Muller, 2010). One of the Steves principal is to hire the best-A-people (Elliot and Simon, 2011). Steve wants only real talent people in the company. There are no training or knowledge share-out in projects or products. He expects excellent ideas and results from his people. In Microsoft, on the other hand, believes in staff training and development.Weve had technology a long time. We had some very sophisticated staff members. What Gates really allowed us to do is to roll it out further to more locations and people and give our staff the training and support to make that happen. (Greiner, 2003) They believe training is the most elementary and sometimes most overlooked from knowledge sharing that need to go in a company. Despite the past decade of U.S. economic stagnation, Apple have grown continuously, and the stock price has advanced to the point where Apple is now the worlds most valuable firm, with a market cap of $391 billion, followed by Exxon-Mobil ($380 billion), IBM ($230 billion), and Microsoft ($228 billion) (Salsman, 2011). Steve Jobs had owned the wealthy company. Nevertheless, Steve Jobs is not known to be a philanthropist. Neither is he active in the charity work as compare to Bill Gates. Steve only concentrated on his products and company. He only public face his visions and products.He does not have the sense of giving back to the companionship. As a charity leader, Bill Gates frequently encourages his staff to contribute to charity, both in terms of money and time. Giving is large part of Microsofts corporate culture. Bill Gates and his wife started The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation take up issues such as poverty, famine, and disease around the world (Lesinski, 2009). This foundation focus on finding cures of diseases which are common in poor nations, also orbiculate development in farming and education. Bill Gates contribution to the community is a reflection of his character and moral. Bill Gates has shown a good example that other leaders should practice and imitate his humanity towards other nations who need helps. Steve Jobs is respected for his products, but Bill Gates is respected for both his products and philanthropic leadership. A well-rounded organization is not unlike a well-rounded individual, they should balance the priority of work, family, charity and personal interest (Brown, 2006). Gates visionary leadership style did not stop at product creation but extended to the creation of a dynasty. Microsoft has sales offices in nearly 60 countries and an international staff of 6200.Almost all of the employees are natives of the country in which they work. It is estimated that each overseas employees generates more than $1million in yearly revenues. Gates tries to make certain that his foreign partners are in ride and that they share in the wealth (Lowe and Gates, 1998 p.74). H e had acquired great wealth, something which he fain shared with stockholders and employees. From his caring nature, Bill Gates had created Microsoft Millionaires from his programmers, managers and even secretaries. Gates vision of wealthy sharing has resulted in livelinessstyle improvement for every level of his employees. Although, Apple staff are well paid, their rewards for success are immensely and nowhere near that of Microsofts. According to Yourdon (2004), Steve commented that Macintosh projects The journey is the reward.Rewards in Apple are different. Steve allowed each designer to personally sign a wit that was reproduced and placed inside each Mac case (Sander, 2012). Rewards are elegant and this is the way Steve reward and recognize his people. As a charismatic and autocratic leader, Steves vision ended at creating the most iconic and desired technological products in history, building the most valuable and renowned brand of his time. There is no doubt that Steves i nfluence and vision will live on in the products and company he created. Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are the visionary leader who always think creatively and have great insight to expect the future, which eventually transform the IT technology and changed the world greatly.6. ConclusionThe purpose of this paper is to discuss of the relevant leadership idea and to explore the leadership styles and to explore the Steve Jobss leadership approach. Considering his influence and success at Apple, it is clear that a study of his leadership can provide valuable lessons for current and aspiring leaders. Steve has often been names one of the most prominent leaders in the US business circles. Despite his early demise, Steve Jobs has and is still touching the lives of people all around the world today. His life makes an amazing story because despite all the hardships he faced and against all odds he achieved what he said he set out to achieve become a millionaire. He had dream and he would not st op until it was lived out. Despite the fact that Steves leadership style is sometimes considered overly authoritative and that his company as being too personality-centered, he was able to achieve unprecedented success.Some of his styles and principals can be considered common and applicable to other business, but others should be applied with caution or adapted to the actual business situation. This brings to mind, one of the essential characteristics of the true leader-to be able to adopt and adapt as well as to accept differing opinion. There is much that we can learn from Steve-his passion, focus and influential nature. puzzle out does not stem from a set of management rules and techniques. Leaders who are passionate about their work, who are able to focus on things that matter most, and exercise unwavering resolve in their decision tend to have a greater influence on people around them. however with such influence, can a leader create positive impact on their followers, thei r organization and even on themselves.7. Reference Adair, rear (2003) taciturn Adair on Leadership. Olympia Elibrary (Online) Available at http//library.olympia.edu.my2051/lib/olympia/docDetail.action?docID=10071301&p00=good%20leader (Accessed 21 whitethorn 2012). Adair, John and Thomas, Neil (2004) Concise Adair on Creativity and Innovation. London, GBR Thorogood Publishing. Bass, Bernard M and Riggio, Ronald E (2008) Transformational Leadership, 2ndEdition. unite States Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Bass, Jossey (1995) Visionary Leadership creating a compelling sense of direction for your organization. Google Book (Online) Available at http//books.google.com.my/books?id=RA3NgwfGEWYC&dq=visionary+leader&source=gbs_book_similarbooks (Online) (Accessed 23 May 2012). Brown, Mark Graham (2006) Baldrige Award Winning Quality. United States of America Productivity Press. Cherry, Kendra (2012) Transformational Leadership. Available at http//psychology.about.com/od/leadership/a/tr ansformational.htm (Accessed 21 May 2012).Chaudhury, Arindam (2012) The best CEO Are Autocrats. Available at http//www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/ accompaniment/51508-the-best-ceos-are-autocrats.html (Accessed 23 May 2012).Coate, Patricia (2007) Focus on Leadership. Bradford, GBR Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. Curry, Myron (1998) bind-Leadership What Makes A Good Leader? Available at http//www.business-marketing.com/article-leaders.php (Accessed 17 May 2012).Dailey, Kate (2011) BBC word Magazine The Cult of Steve Jobs. Available at http//www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15194365(Accessed 23 May 2012).Deschamps, Jean Phillipe (2008) Innovation Leaders. England John Wiley & Son Ltd. DuBrin, Andrew. J (2008) Essentials of Management. Google Book (Online) http//books.google.com.my/books?id=dNThzoekGQcC&pg=PA470&dq=steve+jobs+autocratic&hl=en&sa=X&ei=n33dT76kLpDtrQeXksy6DQ&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAjgUv=onepage&q=steve%20jobs%20autocratic&f= bogus (Accessed 17 June 2012)Elliot, Jay and Simon, William L (2011) The Steve Jobs Way iLeadership for a New Generation. United States of America vanguard Press. Greiner, Joy Marilyn (2004) Exemplary Public Libraries Lessons in Leadership, Management, and Service. United States of America A member of the Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. Gruman, Galen (2011), Mac OS X Lion Bible. United States of America John Wiley & Son, Inc. Isaacson, Walter (1997) Time Magazine U.S In Search of the sure Bill Gates. Available at http//www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1120657-13,00.html (Accessed 23 May 2012)Kahney, Leander (2011) Inside Steves Brain. London Atlantic Books. Lesinski, Jeanne. M (2009) Bill Gates Entrepreneur and Philanthropist. U.S.A Lerner Publishing Group, Inc. Lin, Lucas (2011) Leadership Lesson from Steve Jobs. Available at http//www.articledashboard.com/Article/Leadership-Lessons-from-Steve-Jobs/1423163. (Accessed at 22 May 2012). Livingston, Brian (1994) Infoworld. Google Book (Online) Available at http//books.google.com.my/b ooks?id=gzgEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&dq=A+computer+on+every+disk+in+every+house,+running+Microsoft+software&hl=en&sa=X&ei=1vnET7O5JY6qrAeJwYjKCQ&redir_esc=yv=onepage&q=A%20computer%20on%20every%20disk%20in%20every%20house%2C%20running%20Microsoft%20software&f=false (Accessed 29 May 2012).Lowe, Janet and Gates, Bill (1998), Bill Gates Speaks Insight from the Worlds Greatest Entrepreneur. United States of America John Wiley & Son, Inc. Lussier, Robert.N (2008) Management Fundamentals Concepts, Applications, Skill Development. Google Book (Online) http//books.google.com.my/books?id=p0AIEuN6kg0C&pg=PA30&dq=bill+gates+leadership&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hIHdT-XKCc-HrAew-omzDQ&ved=0CDkQ6AEwATgKv=onepage&q=bill%20gates%20leadership&f=false (Accessed 17 June 2012) Maslin, Janet (2011) Books Of Times Making the iBio for Apples Genius. Available at