Five methods of Departmentalization Essay

Essay TopicWhat five methods have handed-downly been apply to departmentalize stimulate and worker? Give bingle reinforcement and unmatchable disfavour of each. Provide an example of functional departmentalization at your University and using the definitions in your school text explain why it is suitable example. (Chapter 9)In any size of the agreement or complexity workplace, presidencyal organizes ar very important factors that the businesses mustiness have, so the employee will know their position, their responsibilities and tasks. To develop and improve organization per figure outance, the organization can drug abuse various structural can take on, unless the organization need to find the best organisational structure that depends on umteen factors including the work, products or services, the size of the employee, geographic and target market (demographic guests base). The following section provides flesh outs of the five methods have tradition bothy been use t o departmentalize employee and short letters, also advantage and loss each of the methods. Traditional organisational structures are connections among these positions are demonstrated in an organisational Chart which will show how way is organized vertical and horizontal configuration of departments, means and job inwardly a company (Williams & McWilliams 2010, p.175) each of department has a manager, who runs day- to- day trading operations and ultimately report to the CEO, however this traditional model is common use in all church, government and military organization, because these organizations are stable, cannot respond to swop and slow to act.For example every soldiers answer to his commanding officer, while the professorship is at the top of the chain as command-in-chief. Departmentalization is the subdivision of work is the rudimentary meaning of do works. The multidivisional form is defined as decentralized management structure organized into products divisions, e ach division containing a unitary structure and a central office to puff to strategical decisions. (P. James L. 1997) generally the canonical decisions that managers have to make as they develop a traditional organizational structure are using the five traditional methods of functional, product, customer, geographic and hyaloplasm departmentalization. Which mean two or more people working unitedly as a group to complete a specific task, by divided the group to work in diametric departmentalization, to help get to theorganization objectives and goals.However Determining the functions to be performed involves consideration of division of labour, (P. Montanna &B. Charnov, 1993, p. 1) and depending on the size of the grouping that managers supervise. The degree of decision-making authority is centralization and usually were do by the top management of the highest vertically structures hierarchy. This section is additional detail and description of five methods has been used t raditionally to departmentalization. functional departmentalization group of employee and job based on work performance, example finance and accounting, marketing and sale, merciful resource and administration and technical and operating. For another example of Functional departmentalization at Victoria University is Academic Support and Development because this department can students with University opinion tasks such as writing skills, reference skills, online language translator and providing clever support the student academic success and retention across the university.The advantage of functional departmentalization is efficiency of work and is to be done by medical specialist skills and high qualified. The disadvantage is inflexibility of work because the stuff only is qualifies for one specialisation. Products departmentalization group of employee and work for producing major product or services bailiwick in the organization or company. Example David Jones, womens clot hing, mens clothing, home and food. The advantage of the product departmentalization is that increases accountability for product performance and give up manager and employee work in one area of expertise. The disadvantage is the dispute of coordinating across different product departments. Customer departmentalization group of employee and work into particular responsibility based on customers task and need. Example government, reproduction, health, wholesale or retail. The advantage is focused on customer need rather than on products or business function.The disadvantage customer departmentalization is the satisfaction or feedback from customer is challenging of coordinating across different customer departments. geographic Departmentalization groups of employee and work into separate units responsible for doing business in particular geographic area (Williams & McWilliams 2010, p.180). Example North, to the south, West, East). The advantage of geographic departmentalization is view to face communication between the service provider and service receiver. Thedisadvantage is required more human capital and the control cannot exercise effectively. intercellular substance departmentalization a combined of one or two group form of departmentalization are used together based on particular project, or so often are from product and functional departmentalization working together. The advantage of matrix departmentalization is allowing the organization to efficiently manage large, complex tasks and efficiency avoiding duplication.The disadvantage is requires a high level of management skill and can cause of contest between bosses in departments. Through a different perspective on the issue can be seen by comparing between traditional model and redbrick model of the organizational structures, the traditional of organizational structures is illustrated as have effectiveness and efficiency of products or services more than modern organizational structures. Beca use of emphasis on job specialization, highly performed on certain(prenominal) procedures and policy in the organization that effective work and worker, also the decentralisation is the location of most authority at the upper levels of the organization. In a centralized organization, manager makes the most decision, even the relatively small one (Williams & McWilliams 2010, p.185) which help and improve the organization achieve their objectives and goals are better and faster than apply on modern organizational structures. For the modern or 20th century organizational structures is redesigning of making objective and goals setting process is through with(predicate) empower worker.According to(Williams & McWilliams 2010, p.185) Empower worker means permanently vent decision making authority and responsibility from managers to workers by giving them the training and resources they need to make and carry out good decisions. Which means all the process need to be share to every l evels and decentralized authority is allowing a significant amount of worker within the organization make the decision necessary to solve the problem. In conclusion the traditional organizational structures has five methods been used to departmentalizing work and workers such as the work Functional performs, the Product or Service offered, the target Customer or client, the Geographic region covered and the Matrix project that is combine or form two or more departmentalization to work together. These methods are used to in organization which effect work and worker with the best contribute to exertion organizations objectives and goals.Reference listBrews. P.J & Tucci. C. L, 2004, exploring the structural effect of internetworking, strategic management journal, vol. 25. No. 5, pp. 429-451 Woll .L.F.K & Moliance. M, 2013do organizational structure, work environment and grammatical gender matter? creatively and implementations of new ideas, international journal of gender and entrepre neurship, vol. 5. No.3. pp. 298-315 Dufty.N, 1996, a note on departmentalization in an institute of technology, journal of education administration, vol. 4. No. 1, pp. 32-48 Williams. C & McWilliams. A, 2010, MGMT 1st Asian Pacific Edition, Cengage Learning Australia Pty, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Price. L. J, 1997, handbook of organization measurement, international journal of Manpower, vol. 18 Iss 4/5/6 pp.305-558 P. Montanna & B. Charnov, 1993, chapter 11 organizational structures concepts and formats, management A flowing course for students & business people. (Hauppauge, New York Barrons Business Reviewed Series), pp. 155-169