Analysis and Interpertation of “Stolpestad”

Stolpestad by William Lychack I commit that we often consider the fact that we dont wank comme il faut out of our lives. We think a lot close to whether we live our lives to the full. possibly some unrivalled chooses not to live an exciting spright stemmass where every(prenominal) twenty-four hour period, is a new day and a new opportunity. Whether we live a deadening life sometimes alone, sometimes with a family we still wonder if we tucker enough out of our every day and avoid living a stagnant life. But is that plane assertable? Or does some and choose to live a predetermined life which readiness compensate them feel secure because its something familiar even though they might find it boring?But peradventure its not possible to live a secure life with a family and a in force(p) job without getting tired of it? possibly some commonwealth are just stuck in a boring life, without doing something to change it. I regard that is what we see in this dead reputa tion by William Lychack, where we hear around police officer Stolpestad and his stagnant life. Stolpestad certainly depends to be stuck in a routine a boring life, where every day is the same. Day in and day out. As mentioned above we hear about the main voice Stolpestad. Hes a police officer who doesnt bet to be pleased about how his life turned out to be.He doesnt seem happy about his job and it just seems interchangeable his life is at a standstill Was toward the end of your shift, a Saturday, another(prenominal) one of those long slow lazy afternoons of summer solarise never importunate through the clouds, clouds never breaking into rain The day is described in a insect bite negative way because of the choice of words untold(prenominal) as long lazy and slow. But it in like manner seems like both these word and the brave description are a sign of Stolpestads life. Everything seems a kind of inadequate just like the weather.The sun is never really shining so m uch that its sunny, and at the same time, its not really rain either. The weather seems a kind of stagnant just as Stolpestads life. A feature film feature of this short story is the narrator view. The story is told in 2. someone but at the same time the text refers to Stolpestad as a you which means that it seems like its rattling Stolpestad whos break uping the story. by chance even telling the story to himself. The way this short story is indite is a kind of what you would find in self- serve books and not in the intermediate short stories.Besides that its not quite clear when the persons in the story are actually speaking and when its just actions and Stolpestads thoughts Maybe youll take that glass if water after all, you say the boy send into the house the woman asking if you wont just help them. Doesnt she want to call a vet? No, she tells you the boy push button out of the house with a glass of water for you you thanking him and taking a good long drink, This quote too shows that the text is a bit difficult to read because its hard to figure out whether people is actually speaking or if the text is just written in a spoken language.Therere lot of things which emblemize Stolpestads life. For antecedent theres the weather, but also the setting is a symbol of his boring life. Everything is described in a negative way the mileometer like a clock ticking all these bored low pent-up streets and mills and tenements away. The coffee shop, the liquor stores, Laundromats, police, fire, gas stations to happen The shops Stolpestad passes are plain and a kind of colorless, and its something he sees every day. We also hear that he passes his old childhood which means that he actually never really moved away.He just stayed in the same old town where he was born. Maybe therefore you could say that he never really got each further in his life. He just stayed along the same sad streets. The main theme in this short story is clear all the way through the text, and therere a lot of symbols of Stolpestad and his life. A couple of them is ready mentioned, but also the dog, which he is supposed to shoot, is a symbol of Stolpestad. The dog is injured and about to die, but still its a live even though its condition might seem critical.You could say the same about Stolpestad. He is a kind of a living dead person, because it seems like his day is done in zombie-mode. He doesnt get very much out of his life, hes just trying to survive another day at the office, with the wife, the children and the sad streets. So the main theme and also the conclusion is that stagnation isnt something good. You have to wake up and get something out of the day and your life, instead wasting your precious time at endless bar visits and a job where you dont even want to go.Stolpestad is really stuck in his life, and he doesnt get any further, and maybe thats what the point of this story is all about. William Lychack is trying to tell us that we sho uldnt just settle for a boring life. We should go out there and find who and what we wanted and where we wanted it. But whether Stolpestad actually wants or tries to break with his stagnant life is uncertain but it could seem like it in the end of the story, where Stolpestad is actually heading toward the woods maybe a symbol of something different or something new.But in the end Stolpestad is stuck in his life.. and reality stands in the door and she wants her husband to come back inside(a) again, and back to his every day routine. &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212 1 . Stolpestad by William Lychack. knave 1. line 1-4 2 . Stolpestad by William Lychack. Page 2. line 62-66. 3 . Stolpestad by William Lychack. Page 1. line 3-5 4 . Stolpestad by William Lychack. Page 1. Line 11